Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews
Volume 21, Issue 2 , Pages 85-89, April 2010

Navigating the clinical development landscape for oncolytic viruses and other cancer therapeutics: No shortcuts on the road to approval

  • Caroline J. Breitbach

      Affiliations

    • Jennerex Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Tony Reid

      Affiliations

    • University of California, San Diego Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
  • ,
  • James Burke

      Affiliations

    • Billings Clinic, Billings, MT, USA
  • ,
  • John C. Bell

      Affiliations

    • Jennerex Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
    • Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
    • Centre for Cancer Therapeutics, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
  • ,
  • David H. Kirn

      Affiliations

    • Jennerex Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Jennerex Inc. 201 Mission Suite 1380, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA.

published online 18 May 2010.

Abstract 

Chemotherapy remains a common mode of anticancer treatment even though in most cancer indications the therapeutic approach is not effective and ultimately associated with the onset of chemoresistance. A better understanding of genetic differences in tumors ushered in the era of targeted therapy which has revolutionized the treatment of certain cancer types. However, generally targeted therapies are only cytostatic and a proportion of the patient population may be non-responsive to targeted therapy due to mutations of other genes in the same pathway (e.g. ras mutations in patients with colorectal cancer treated with EGFR targeted therapy). Therefore, there exists a need for a radically new approach to cancer therapy. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) possess many properties of an ideal cancer therapeutic. OVs are cytotoxic and target cancers via multiple mechanisms of action while at the same time exploiting validated genetic pathways known to be dysregulated in many cancers. Indeed, promising safety and efficacy data has emerged from Phase 1 and Phase 2 trials with diverse OVs (e.g. JX-594, a targeted oncolytic poxvirus). Though the field has lagged behind with pivotal, randomized Phase 3 trials, these are currently being initiated for a number of OVs. In addition, the field must ensure a continued clinical development of newly developed OVs; a strategy for the clinical development of novel cancer therapeutics is outlined.

Keywords: Oncolytic virus, Targeted therapy, Clinical development

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1359-6101(10)00012-2

doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2010.02.001

Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews
Volume 21, Issue 2 , Pages 85-89, April 2010